A tale of two inspection methods: Comparing an ehealth literacy and user experience checklist with heuristic evaluation

5Citations
Citations of this article
51Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Adhering to user experience (UX) and eHealth literacy principles when developing consumer health information systems (HISs) can not only improve a user's experience but can also have implications on patient safety. Methods exist to explore these dimensions independently, but few methods are available for evaluating consumer (i.e., citizen) health information systems for their adherence to usability and eHealth literacy design principles simultaneously. In this paper, we compared two inspection (i.e., expert review) tools and identified the strengths and weaknesses of each. The findings from this comparison can assist researchers, consumer health information system developers, and evaluators choosing between the two alternatives. Moreover, our comparison revealed the shortcomings in both tools and the need for a novel, purpose-built tool that is more comprehensive than either of the existing tools that assess UX and eHealth literacy and more adequately address design guidelines for the mobile environment. © 2021 European Federation for Medical Informatics (EFMI) and IOS Press.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Monkman, H., & Griffith, J. (2021). A tale of two inspection methods: Comparing an ehealth literacy and user experience checklist with heuristic evaluation. In Public Health and Informatics: Proceedings of MIE 2021 (pp. 906–910). IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI210310

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free