Postdigital Videogames Literacies: Thinking With, Through, and Beyond James Gee’s Learning Principles

31Citations
Citations of this article
68Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This article is a collective response to the 2003 iteration of James Paul Gee’s What Video Games Have to Teach Us About Learning and Literacy. Gee’s book, a foundational text for those working in game studies, literacy studies, and education, identified 36 principles of ‘good learning’ which he argued were built into the design of good games, and which have since been used to unsettle the landscape of formal education. This article brings together 21 short theoretical and empirical contributions which centre postdigital perspectives to re-engage with, and extend, the arguments first raised by Gee regarding the relationship between videogames and learning. Organised into five groups, these contributions suggest that concepts and attitudes associated with the postdigital offer new thinking tools for challenging grand narrative claims about the educative potential of technologies while also providing rich analytical frames for revisiting Gee’s claims in terms of postdigital videogame literacies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bacalja, A., Nichols, T. P., Robinson, B., Bhatt, I., Kucharczyk, S., Zomer, C., … Schnaider, K. (2024). Postdigital Videogames Literacies: Thinking With, Through, and Beyond James Gee’s Learning Principles. Postdigital Science and Education, 6(4), 1103–1142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-024-00510-3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free