Penalty-free approach to accelerating constrained quantum optimization

2Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Traditional methods for handling (inequality) constraints in the quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) typically rely on penalty terms and slack variables, which increase problem complexity and expand the search space. More sophisticated mixer-based QAOA variants restrict the search within the feasible assignments but often suffer from prohibitive circuit complexity. This paper presents a penalty-free formalism for incorporating inequality constraints into the cost function of QAOA using an oracle-based subroutine that evaluates constraint satisfaction in an additional register, subsequently called indicator function QAOA (IF-QAOA). Applied to the knapsack problem, we demonstrate in numerical simulations the superior performance of IF-QAOA over conventional penalty-based approaches. Using advanced QAOA simulation techniques, we find that IF-QAOA achieves significantly higher solution quality and a faster time to solution in 82% of our benchmark cases, even though circuit depth is approximately three times larger. Analysis of the scaling behavior shows favorable scaling of IF-QAOA compared to penalty-based methods. Also, benchmarks against the recently developed quantum tree generator QAOA for knapsack problems (P. Christiansen et al., arXiv:2411.00518) demonstrated higher solution quality for circuits of similar depth. Additionally, this paper introduces a method for approximating the indicator function when the number of ancillary qubits is limited or the constraint function is noninteger. With a specialized simulation algorithm based on projective measurements, we empirically demonstrate that this formalism can encode general inequality constraints using a fixed number of ancillary qubits.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bucher, D., Stein, J., Feld, S., & Linnhoff-Popien, C. (2025). Penalty-free approach to accelerating constrained quantum optimization. Physical Review A, 112(6). https://doi.org/10.1103/fb5m-cl9m

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free