Always, already-medicalized: Women’s prenatal knowledge and choice in two Canadian contexts

8Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Women’s childbirth choices occur within contested discourses about medical, natural, and woman-centered births. All three perspectives, to slightly differing degrees, presume an autonomous female subject who makes childbirth choices. Thus informed choice is posed as a crucial corrective to the increasing medicalization of childbirth. This article employs a critical feminist analysis to examine how women learn about childbirth and make choices long before the moment of informed choice. Interviews with 40 pregnant and recently birthing women in two cities in Alberta, Canada illustrate how media, family and friends, and prenatal courses comprised core pre-birth knowledge systems informing women’s decision-making. The interviews exposed how medicalization is naturalized in these knowledge systems, so that women approached their actual births with an already-medicalized set of perceptions. This already-medicalized knowledge foreclosed women’s choices, a finding that complicates arguments over improving informed choice during childbirth as a means of reducing childbirth medicalization.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Malacrida, C. (2015). Always, already-medicalized: Women’s prenatal knowledge and choice in two Canadian contexts. Current Sociology, 63(5), 636–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392115590075

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free