Use of albumin in spontaneous bacterial peritonitis is cost-effective

  • Farrugia A
  • Bansal M
  • Caraceni P
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction Assessing the cost-effectiveness of therapeutic interventions is increasingly crucial for health decision-making. Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is one of the major complications of liver cirrhosis. The use of albumin in conjunction with antibiotics has been shown to be effective through clinical trials [1]. Methods A decision tree (TreeAge) (Figure 1) was populated from published sources for clinical, cost and epidemiologic variables. The perspective taken was that of the US payer. The robustness of the model was checked using one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. The clinical course was followed for 3 months or until death. Total medical costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) [2] were calculated. Results Total costs were decreased when using albumin, and the improved survival resulted in an additional QALY for patients on albumin, decreasing the cost per QALY. See Table 1 and Figure 2. Conclusion The use of albumin in the treatment of SPB is cost-effective.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Farrugia, A., Bansal, M., & Caraceni, P. (2015). Use of albumin in spontaneous bacterial peritonitis is cost-effective. Critical Care, 19(S1). https://doi.org/10.1186/cc14433

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free