Dystonia treatment

  • Pirio Richardson S
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To determine the frequency of medication use in patients with dystonia enrolled in an international biorepository study. METHODS In a cross-sectional analysis, we included 2,026 participants enrolled at 37 sites in the United States, Canada, Europe, and Australia through Project 1 of the Dystonia Coalition, an international biorepository study. The primary aim was to assess the frequency of medication classes recommended for treating patients with dystonia, and the secondary aim was to compare characteristics (disease type, age, sex, duration of disease, comorbid conditions, severity). RESULTS Querying the database for the presence of any medication for dystonia used (includes both injectable and oral therapy), we found 73% using medications (n = 1,488) and 27% using no dystonia medications (n = 538). Furthermore, 61% of the total sample used botulinum toxin (BoNT) therapy alone or in combination. Differences were found in medication use patterns by dystonia type, with the lowest oral medication use in focal dystonia and highest use in generalized dystonia; by region, with highest BoNT therapy rate reported in Italy and the lowest in the Northeast region of the United States; and by focal dystonia subtype, with highest BoNT therapy alone in blepharospasm and spasmodic dysphonia (49%) and lowest in other cranial dystonia (32%). CONCLUSIONS The majority of patients with dystonia enrolled in the Dystonia Coalition Project 1 were using medications to treat their dystonia. Overall, a complex picture of medication use patterns emerged, with factors such as region, disease duration, type of dystonia, disease severity, and psychiatric comorbidities all playing a significant role.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pirio Richardson, S., Wegele, A. R., Skipper, B., Deligtisch, A., … Arif, C. (2017). Dystonia treatment. Neurology, 88(6), 543–550. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000003596

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free