A Response to the Paal et al. Rejoinder: Religiosity and Risk of Parkinson’s Disease in England and the USA

8Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This commentary provides a response to the rejoinder by Paal et al. (Journal of Religion and Health. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-022-01726-y, 2023), regarding the research of Otaiku (Journal of Religion and Health. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-022-01603-8, 2022) “Religiosity and risk of Parkinson’s disease in England and the USA.” After providing a brief overview of Otaiku’s work, the commentary then addresses each of Paal et al.’s arguments. While agreeing that more research needs to be undertaken, this commentary concludes that Otaiku’s research findings are well founded, suggesting that greater religiosity may lower the risk of PD.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Koenig, H. G. (2023). A Response to the Paal et al. Rejoinder: Religiosity and Risk of Parkinson’s Disease in England and the USA. Journal of Religion and Health, 62(6), 4215–4221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-022-01734-y

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free