Assessment and comparison of radiation dose and image quality in multi-detector CT scanners in non-contrast head and neck examinations

30Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: To assess and compare radiation dose and image quality from non-contrast head and neck computed tomography (CT) examinations from four different multi-detector CT (MDCT) scanners. Material and methods: Four CT scanners with different numbers of detector rows including one 4-MDCT, a 6-MDCT, a 16-MDCT, and a 64-MDCT were investigated. Common CT dose descriptors including volumetric CT dose index (CTDIv), dose length product (DLP), and the effective dose (ED), and image quality parameters include image noise, uniformity, and spatial resolution (SR) were estimated for each CT scanner with standard tools and methods. To have a precise comparison between CT scanners and related doses and image quality parameters, the ImPACT Q-factor was used. Results: Minimum and maximum CTDIv, DLP, and ED in the head scan were 18 ± 3 and 49 ± 4 mGy, 242 ± 28 and 692 ± 173 mGy × cm, 0.46 ± 0.4 and 1.31 ± 0.33 mSv for 16-MDCT and 64-MDCT, respectively. And 16 ± 2 to 27 ± 3, 286 ± 127 to 645 ± 79 and 1.46 ± 0.65 to 3.29 ± 0.40 for neck scan, respectively. The Q-factor in head scan was 2.4, 3.3, 4.4 and 5.6 for 4-MDCT, 6-MDCT, 16-MDCT and 64-MDCT, respectively. The Q-factor in neck scan was 3.4, 4.6, 4.7 and 6.0 for 4-MDCT, 6-MDCT, 16-MDCT and 64-MDCT, respectively. Conclusions: The results clearly indicate an increasing trend in the Q-factor from 4-MDCT to 64-MDCT units in both head and neck examinations. This increasing trend is due to a better SR and less noise of images taken and/or fewer doses in 64-MDCT.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Khoramian, D., Sistani, S., & Firouzjah, R. A. (2019). Assessment and comparison of radiation dose and image quality in multi-detector CT scanners in non-contrast head and neck examinations. Polish Journal of Radiology, 84, e61–e67. https://doi.org/10.5114/pjr.2019.82743

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free