Treatment Outcomes and Prognostic Factors of Direct Pulp Capping in Permanent Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

7Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the overall treatment outcomes of direct pulp capping in permanent teeth and investigate the prognostic factors. MEDLINE via Ovid, EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and manual search methods were used to select the included studies. After thorough screening, the criteria for quality assessment and data extraction were determined. Meta-analysis was performed using the random-effects model and meta-regression analysis. This systematic review included 33 studies, 11 prospective cohort studies, 9 retrospective cohort studies, and 13 randomised clinical trials. After applying the quality assessment criteria, 26 articles were included in the meta-analysis. The weighted pooled success rate was 83%, with a 95% confidence interval of 79-87% in studies that ranged from 6 months to 10 years. The meta-regression analysis showed that rubber dam isolation throughout all procedures was significantly more effective than other techniques (risk ratio=1.44; 95% confidence interval 1.06-2.16, p<0.05). This study provides evidence of successful treatment outcomes in direct pulp capping of permanent teeth, with "adequate tooth isolation" identified as a significant prognostic factor.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Prasertsuksom, N., Osiri, S., Jaruchotiratanasakul, N., & Ongchavalit, L. (2024). Treatment Outcomes and Prognostic Factors of Direct Pulp Capping in Permanent Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. European Endodontic Journal. Kare Publishing. https://doi.org/10.14744/eej.2024.93723

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free