Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate healthcare costs, resource utilization, associated costs, and lost productivity for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in an average-risk population Methods: This retrospective cohort study identified average-risk individuals (50–75 years) with claims in the Optum Research Database for CRC screening test between 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2018. Index date was defined as the first date of a claim for colonoscopy, fecal immunochemical test (FIT), guaiac-based fecal occult blood test (FOBT) or multi-target stool DNA test (mt-sDNA). Screening costs were evaluated with descriptive statistics and multivariable analyses, adjusting for patient characteristics and index screening costs. Results: In total, 903,831 individuals were identified by test groups: mt-sDNA (n = 29,614), FIT (n = 254,002), guaiac-based FOBT (n = 112,757) and colonoscopy (n = 507,458). Adjusted costs for index screening were, colonoscopy ($3,029), mt-sDNA ($752), FIT ($45), and (FOBT ($153). Adjusted costs across the six months following the index screening were $146 for colonoscopy, $329 for mt-sDNA, $306 for FIT, and $412 for FOBT. Colonoscopy had the highest costs for lost productivity. Conclusions: Screening colonoscopy had the highest productivity loss and healthcare costs up-front, suggesting potential cost benefits for noninvasive screening modalities. The more frequent screening interval required for FIT and FOBT resulted in a higher yearly cost than colonoscopy or mt-sDNA.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Engel-Nitz, N. M., Miller-Wilson, L. A., Le, L., & Fisher, D. A. (2023). Healthcare costs, resource utilization, and productivity loss associated with colorectal cancer screening. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, 23(7), 843–852. https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2023.2220965
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.