Evaluation of gene flow in structured and seed blend refuge systems of non-Bt and Bt corn

11Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Gene flow between Bt and non-Bt plants can have implications for resistance management. In 2013 and 2014, field trials in Maryland and Louisiana measured gene flow in three refuge systems: (1) structured refuge stand of purple-seeded corn flanked on both sides by stands of yellow corn; (2) seed blend of yellow corn containing purple corn as refuges; and (3) seed blend of purple-seeded corn containing yellow corn as refuges. The presence of cross-pollinated purple kernels was used as a marker to quantify gene flow. In the structured refuge, cross-pollination between Bt and structured refuge plants averaged 5.4% on adjacent rows and decreased significantly moving away from the interface. For refuge system 2, outcrossing of pollen from the refuge plants was < 1% in ears of neighboring Bt plants both within and on adjacent rows. Cross-pollination was generally higher for plants nearest to the refuge plant. In refuge system 3, outcrossing of pollen from neighboring Bt plants caused 18.6% refuge kernels expressing the purple trait. Laboratory bioassay showed that consumption of a meridic diet containing 6% refuge kernel tissue collected from a 95:5% seed blend field caused significant larval growth inhibition of the corn earworm, Helicoverpa zea (Boddie). Overall findings suggest that effects of gene outcrossing from refuge plants to Bt plants in the seed blend systems are likely not a great issue, but significant gene flow from neighboring Bt plants to refuge plants could reduce the number of homozygous susceptible larvae produced and favor survival of heterozygotes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dively, G. P., Huang, F., Oyediran, I., Burd, T., & Morsello, S. (2020). Evaluation of gene flow in structured and seed blend refuge systems of non-Bt and Bt corn. Journal of Pest Science, 93(1), 439–447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-019-01126-4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free