A complete audit cycle to assess adherence to a lung protective ventilation strategy

8Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

There is clear evidence for the use of a protective ventilation protocol in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). There is evidence to suggest that protective ventilation is beneficial in patients at risk of ARDS. A protective ventilation strategy was implemented on our intensive care unit in critical care patients who required mechanical ventilation for over 48 h, with and at risk for ARDS. A complete audit cycle was performed over 13 months to assess compliance with a safe ventilation protocol in intensive care. The ARDS network mechanical ventilation protocol was used as the standard for our protective ventilation strategy. This recommends ventilation with a tidal volume (Vt ) of 6 ml/kg of ideal body weight (IBW) and plateau airway pressure of ≤30 cm H2 O. The initial audit failed to meet this standard with Vt ′s of 9.5 ml/kg of IBW. Following the implementation of a ventilation strategy and an educational program, we demonstrate a significant improvement in practice with Vt ′s of 6.6 ml/kg of IBW in the re-audit. This highlights the importance of simple interventions and continuous education in maintaining high standards of care.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Joynes, E., Dalay, S., Patel, J. M., & Fayek, S. (2014). A complete audit cycle to assess adherence to a lung protective ventilation strategy. Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine, 18(11), 746–749. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-5229.144020

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free