Patient-controlled analgesia: Epidural fentanyl and i.v. morphine compared after Caesarean section

35Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We have compared patient-controlled epidural fentanyl (PCEF) and patient-controlled i.v. morphine (PCIM) after Caesarean section in 84 patients, in a randomized, double-blind study. All patients had an epidural and an i.v. patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device, one of which delivered normal saline. Group PCEF received epidural fentanyl 20 μg with a 10-min lockout. Group PCIM received i.v. morphine 1 mg with a 5-min lockout. PCA use was lower for PCEF patients (P = 0.0007). The highest pain score recorded at rest for PCEF patients was median 20 (interquartile range 10-33) mm compared with 32 (14-52) mm for PCIM patients (P = 0.02). The highest pain score recorded on coughing was 31 (21-41) mm with PCEF compared with 56 (30-71) mm for PCIM (P = 0.001). There was less nausea (P = 0.02) and drowsiness (P = 0.0003) with PCEF. There was no difference in the overall incidence and severity of pruritus (P = 0.77). However, pruritus started earlier with PCEF.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cooper, D. W., Saleh, U., Taylor, M., Whyte, S., Ryall, D., Kokri, M. S., … McArthur, E. (1999). Patient-controlled analgesia: Epidural fentanyl and i.v. morphine compared after Caesarean section. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 82(3), 366–370. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/82.3.366

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free