Prior Occupation and Schismatic Principles: Toward a Normative Theorization of Aboriginal Title

  • Newman D
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

There are two divergent principles underlying theconstitutional recognition of Aboriginal title in s. 35(1) of the Constitution Act, 1982 the historically-oriented principle of "prior occupation, " and the forward-looking principle of "reconciliation. " A closer look at the principle of "prior occupation " reveals several possible rationales behind its requirement in the test for Aboriginal title: to promote economic efficiency; to ground a natural right of ownership; and to function as a proxy for the protection of individual or group identity.  However, each of these rationales fails to adequately respond to both previous jurisprudence in the area and the need to achieve a just and legally sound system for determining future claims. If "prior occupation" is instead understood as a proxy for "community connections to land," then the primary interests at stake are more clearly revealed. It is then possible to develop a principled and more consistent way of dealing with Aboriginal title claims in a way that respects the interests of all involved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Newman, D. G. (2015). Prior Occupation and Schismatic Principles: Toward a Normative Theorization of Aboriginal Title. Alberta Law Review, 779. https://doi.org/10.29173/alr370

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free