“Preemptive Suppression” – Judges Claim the Right to Find Digital Evidence Inadmissible Before It Is Even Discovered

  • Simpson B
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

[...]evidence of other potentially serious crimes (e.g., murder, kidnapping, extortion) is "suppressed" - excluded from use in any prosecution- before it is even gathered. * CDT Condition 2: [...]Condition 2 is more than unnecessary, it is "worse than useless."

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Simpson, B. (2012). “Preemptive Suppression” – Judges Claim the Right to Find Digital Evidence Inadmissible Before It Is Even Discovered. Journal of Digital Forensics, Security and Law. https://doi.org/10.15394/jdfsl.2012.1132

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free