Tial6v4 alloy surface modifications and their impact on biofilm development of s. Aureus and s. epidermidis

9Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

One of the most serious complications following joint replacement surgeries are peripros-thetic infections (PIs) arising from the adhesion of bacteria to the artificial joint. Various types of titanium–aluminum–vanadium (TiAl6V4) alloy surface modifications (coatings with silver (Ag), titanium nitride (TiN), pure titanium (cpTi), combinations of cpTi and hydroxyapatite (HA), combinations of cpTi and tricalcium phosphate (TCP), and a rough-blasted surface of TiAl6V4) have been investigated to assess their effects on biofilm development. Biofilms were grown, collected, and analyzed after 48 h to measure their protein and glucose content and the cell viability. Biofilm-associated genes were also monitored after 48 h of development. There was a distinct difference in the development of staphylococcal biofilms on the surfaces of the different types of alloy. According to the findings of this study, the base alloy TiAl6V4 and the TiN-coated surface are the most promis-ing materials for biofilm reduction. Rough surfaces are most favorable when it comes to bacterial infections because they allow an easy attachment of pathogenic organisms. Of all rough surfaces tested, rough-blasted TiAl6V4 was the most favorable as an implantation material; all the other rough surfaces showed more distinct signs of inducing the development of biofilms which displayed higher protein and polysaccharide contents. These results are supported by RT-qPCR measurements of biofilm associated genes for Staphylococcus aureus (icaA, icaC, fnbA, fnbB, clfB, atl) and Staphylococcus epidermidis (atle, aap).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Paulitsch-Fuchs, A. H., Wolrab, L., Eck, N., Dyer, N. P., Bödendorfer, B., & Lohberger, B. (2021). Tial6v4 alloy surface modifications and their impact on biofilm development of s. Aureus and s. epidermidis. Journal of Functional Biomaterials, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/JFB12020036

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free