Influence of implant inclination and prosthetic abutment type on the biomechanics of implant-supported fixed partial dentures

13Citations
Citations of this article
42Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Obtaining parallelism during implant placement is often difficult, leading to inclination of implants. The present study evaluated the stress distribution in 3-unit fixed partial dentures supported by 2 implants with different inclinations and prosthetic abutments. Universal castable long abutments (UCLAs) or tapered abutments were used considering 178 of implant angulation in different directions (mesial, distal, buccal, or lingual). To do so, 3-dimensional finite element models were built and exported to specific analysis software. Forces were applied to the functional cusps. Data were obtained with regard to the maximum principal and von Mises stresses (in MPa). No relevant differences were observed in the stress values in the cortical and cancellous bone nor in the prosthesis with UCLA or tapered abutments. However, a relevant stress reduction in the prosthetic screws of the tilted implant was observed when using UCLA abutments. According to the obtained results, it is possible to suggest that both UCLA or tapered abutments can be used for 3-unit fixed partial dentures when 1 of the implants is tilted. UCLA abutment might lead to less biomechanical problems related to screw loosening or fracture.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Poletto-Neto, V., Tretto, P. H. W., Zen, B. M., SBacchi, A., & Santos, M. B. F. D. (2019). Influence of implant inclination and prosthetic abutment type on the biomechanics of implant-supported fixed partial dentures. Journal of Oral Implantology, 45(5), 343–349. https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-D-18-00305

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free