Collaboration support method based on analyzing individual differences in designers' idea evaluation

2Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

To maximize designers' creativity during collaborative design processes, this paper focuses on designers' individual differences, especially differences in their idea evaluations, and proposes an analytical method for revealing their differences. During creative group activity, when a designer represents an idea using some words or a short sentence, the others imagine the concrete image of the idea form the presented words and evaluate the concretized idea in their mind. However, the results of their concretizations and evaluations vary among designers in most cases. Such differences or diversities seem to be undesirable, but they have a huge potential for leading new ideas during divergent processes of exploring ideas. Therefore, the method proposed here reveals designers' individual differences by analyzing the results of their idea evaluations and encourages their further idea explanations. In addition, to confirm the effectiveness of the proposed method, the case study is carried out and its results and detailed processes are analyzed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kobayashi, M., Kawakami, T., & Higashi, M. (2010). Collaboration support method based on analyzing individual differences in designers’ idea evaluation. Nihon Kikai Gakkai Ronbunshu, C Hen/Transactions of the Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers, Part C, 76(764), 1000–1008. https://doi.org/10.1299/kikaic.76.1000

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free