Prospective Observational Study of the Clinical Prognoses of Patients with Bloodstream Infections Caused by Ampicillin-Susceptible but Penicillin-Resistant Enterococcus faecalis

30Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical impacts of ampicillin-susceptible but penicillin-resistant (ASPR) phenotypes of Enterococcus faecalis on clinical outcomes in patients with bloodstream infection (BSI). A total of 295 patients with an E. faecalis BSI from six sentinel hospitals during a 2-year period (from May 2016 to April 2018) were enrolled in this study. Putative risk factors, including host-, treatment-, and pathogen-related variables, were assessed to determine the associations with the 30-day mortality rate of patients with an E. faecalis BSI. The proportion of ASPR E. faecalis isolates was 22.7% (67/295). ASPR isolates (adjusted odds ratio, 2.27; 95% confidence interval, 1.01 to 5.02) exhibited a significant association with an increased 30-day mortality rate, and a significant difference in survival was identified in a group of patients treated with ampicillin- and/or piperacillin-based regimens who were stratified according to the penicillin susceptibility of the causative pathogen (P 0.011 by a log rank test). ASPR E. faecalis BSIs resulted in a 2-fold-higher 30-day mortality rate (26.9%; 18/67) than for the BSIs caused by penicillin-susceptible strains (12.3%; 28/228). The differences in mortality rates of patients stratified by penicillin susceptibility were likely due to the treatment failures of ampicillin and/or piperacillin in patients with an ASPR E. faecalis BSI.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kim, D., Lee, H., Yoon, E. J., Hong, J. S., Shin, J. H., Uh, Y., … Jeong, S. H. (2019). Prospective Observational Study of the Clinical Prognoses of Patients with Bloodstream Infections Caused by Ampicillin-Susceptible but Penicillin-Resistant Enterococcus faecalis. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 63(7). https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00291-19

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free