Abstract
Background: Nonballoon low-profile gastrostomy tubes (GTs) are used for enteral nutrition support in a subset of pediatric patients with feeding difficulties when use of balloon GTs is problematic. Different nonballoon low-profile tube types are available, but comparative studies are lacking. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study comparing complications and outcomes between different low-profile nonballoon GTs at a pediatric tertiary care center over 10 years. Results: We identified 43 patients with 160 tube placement procedures, including 93 (58%) BARD tubes (type A) and 67 (42%) Mini-ONE tubes (type B). Accidental tube dislodgment occurred exclusively with type B (33% vs 0%, P
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Hajjat, T., & Rahhal, R. M. (2017). Differences in Durability, Dislodgement, and Other Complications with Use of Low-Profile Nonballoon Gastrostomy Tubes in Children. Nutrition in Clinical Practice, 32(2), 219–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/0884533616680356
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.