Differences in Durability, Dislodgement, and Other Complications with Use of Low-Profile Nonballoon Gastrostomy Tubes in Children

3Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Nonballoon low-profile gastrostomy tubes (GTs) are used for enteral nutrition support in a subset of pediatric patients with feeding difficulties when use of balloon GTs is problematic. Different nonballoon low-profile tube types are available, but comparative studies are lacking. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study comparing complications and outcomes between different low-profile nonballoon GTs at a pediatric tertiary care center over 10 years. Results: We identified 43 patients with 160 tube placement procedures, including 93 (58%) BARD tubes (type A) and 67 (42%) Mini-ONE tubes (type B). Accidental tube dislodgment occurred exclusively with type B (33% vs 0%, P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hajjat, T., & Rahhal, R. M. (2017). Differences in Durability, Dislodgement, and Other Complications with Use of Low-Profile Nonballoon Gastrostomy Tubes in Children. Nutrition in Clinical Practice, 32(2), 219–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/0884533616680356

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free