Effect of different methods of inoculation and co-inoculation of Bradyrhizobium spp. and Azospirillum brasilense on soybean agronomic performance in fields with a history of inoculation

11Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The yield gain of soybean inoculated with Bradyrhizobium spp. or co-inoculated with Bradyrhizobium spp. and Azospirillum brasilense is variable. Inoculants can be applied in the sowing furrow or via seed treatment. There is a gap in our understanding of the efficacy of different inoculation methods. This study aimed to assess the agronomic efficiency of soybean inoculated and co-inoculated with Bradyrhizobium spp. and A. brasilense by different methods. The study was conducted in Paraná State, Brazil, in two seasons. Five treatments were tested: control; seed treatment with Bradyrhizobium spp. (SBr), seed treatment with Bradyrhizobium spp. + A. brasilense (SBr+Az), in-furrow treatment with Bradyrhizobium spp. (FBr), and in-furrow treatment with Bradyrhizobium spp. + A. brasilense (FBr+Az). Shoot dry weight, grain nitrogen content and grain yield were lower in 2018/19. In 2017/18, FBr+Az increased nodule number and dry weight compared with SBr. FBr+Az promoted a 47% increase in pods per plant compared with the control in both seasons. Regardless of season, grain nitrogen content was higher with FBr+Az (mean relative increase of 27%). FBr+Az was superior to SBr+Az in 2017/18, with a 12% increase in yield. Inoculation and co-inoculation improve morphological traits and soybean yield. In-furrow inoculation is more efficient than seed treatment.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Marcos Brignoli, F., de Oliveira Zampar, E. J., Henrique Vieira de Almeida, J., Cassim, B. M. A. R., Inoue, T. T., & Batista, M. A. (2023). Effect of different methods of inoculation and co-inoculation of Bradyrhizobium spp. and Azospirillum brasilense on soybean agronomic performance in fields with a history of inoculation. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 69(14), 2925–2937. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2023.2184807

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free