The Role of Paradata in Algorithmic Accountability

4Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This chapter examines how the doings of the algorithm (instantiated through its operations, actions, and steps) and its accompanying algorithmic system are revealed and explored through an engagement with the paradata created as a part of this data-making effort. In doing so, the chapter explores how the concept of paradata helps us understand how information professionals and domain stakeholders conceptualize accountable algorithmic entities and how this influences how they emerge as documented and describable entities. Two complementary frameworks for capturing and preserving paradata for accountability purposes are examined in the process. The first is associated with diplomatic theory and archival notions of context and focuses on the role of paradata for algorithmic transparency. The second is related to knowledge management and to efforts in the AI community to use paradata to create unified reporting models that enhance the explainability of algorithms and algorithmic systems. The chapter concludes by demarcating examples and different use cases for paradata for accountability purposes and the mechanisms by which these agents of transparency and explainability can connect with interested and vested audiences.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Trace, C. B., & Hodges, J. A. (2024). The Role of Paradata in Algorithmic Accountability. In Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning (Vol. 13, pp. 197–213). Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53946-6_11

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free