Clustering of Local Group Distances: Publication Bias or Correlated Measurements? V. Galactic Rotation Constants

  • de Grijs R
  • Bono G
25Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

As part of an extensive data mining effort, we have compiled a database of 162 Galactic rotation speed measurements at R 0 (the solar Galactocentric distance), . Published between 1927 and 2017 June, this represents the most comprehensive set of values since the 1985 meta-analysis that led to the last revision of the International Astronomical Union’s recommended Galactic rotation constants. Although we do not find any compelling evidence for the presence of “publication bias” in recent decades, we find clear differences among the values and the ratios resulting from the use of different tracer populations. Specifically, young tracers (including OB and supergiant stars, masers, Cepheid variables, H ii regions, and young open clusters), as well as kinematic measurements of Sgr A* near the Galactic Center, imply a significantly larger Galactic rotation speed at the solar circle and a higher ratio (i.e., km s −1 and km s −1 kpc −1 ; statistical uncertainties only) than any of the tracers dominating the Galaxy’s mass budget (i.e., field stars and the H i /CO distributions). Using the latter to be most representative of the bulk of the Galaxy’s matter distribution, we arrive at an updated set of Galactic rotation constants,

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

de Grijs, R., & Bono, G. (2017). Clustering of Local Group Distances: Publication Bias or Correlated Measurements? V. Galactic Rotation Constants. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 232(2), 22. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/aa8b71

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free