Scientific Myth-Conceptions

129Citations
Citations of this article
165Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Using several familiar examples-Gregor Mendel, H. B. D. Kettlewell, Alexander Fleming, Ignaz Semmelweis, and William Harvey-I analyze how educators currently frame historical stories to portray the process of science. They share a rhetorical architecture of myth, which misleads students about how science derives its authority. Narratives of error and recovery from error, alternatively, may importantly illustrate the nature of science, especially its limits. Contrary to recent claims for reform, we do not need more history in science education. Rather, we need different types of history that convey the nature of science more effectively. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Allchin, D. (2003). Scientific Myth-Conceptions. Science Education, 87(3), 329–351. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10055

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free