Comparison of 2 mapping strategies for pulmonary vein isolation

9Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Pulmonary vein (PV) isolation using a circular catheter (CC) creates an entrance block from the left atrium (LA) to PV to eliminate paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). We describe a new approach for PV isolation during distal PV pacing using a basket catheter (BC). The purpose of the present study was to compare 2 mapping strategies for PV isolation. Methods and Results: Of 100 consecutive patients with PAF, 50 underwent CC-guided PV isolation and 50 underwent BC-guided PV isolation. During CC-guided ablation, the endpoint was the elimination of PV potentials based on the entrance block from the LA to PV. During BC-guided ablation during distal PV pacing, the endpoint was the elimination of bidirectional PV-LA conduction. At 12 months, 62% of patients who underwent CC ablation and 80% of patients who underwent BC ablation were free of symptomatic PAF without the use of antiarrhythmic drugs (p<0.05). The incidence of mild (<50%) PV stenosis in BC ablation was significantly lower than that in CC ablation (12 vs 24%, p<0.01). Conclusions: This new approach for PV isolation during distal PV pacing using BC is useful for confirming a bidirectional PV- LA conduction block and is more effective than CC ablation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kumagai, K., Ogawa, M., Noguchi, H., Nakashima, H., Zhang, B., Miura, S. I., & Saku, K. (2005). Comparison of 2 mapping strategies for pulmonary vein isolation. Circulation Journal, 69(12), 1496–1502. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.69.1496

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free