Accuracy Comparison Between Feedforward Neural Network, Support Vector Machine and Boosting Ensembles for Financial Risk Evaluation

4Citations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Loan defaults have become an increasing concern for lending institutions, presenting significant challenges to profitability and operational stability. However, with the advent of advanced data processing capabilities, greater data availability, and the development of sophisticated machine learning techniques—particularly neural networks—new opportunities have emerged for classifying and predicting loan defaults beyond traditional manual methods. This, in turn, can reduce risk and enhance overall financial performance. In recent years, institutions have increasingly employed these advanced techniques to mitigate the risk of non-performing loans (NPLs) by improving loan approval efficiency. This study aims to address a gap in the literature by examining the predictive performance of different neural network architectures on financial loan datasets. Specifically, it compares the effectiveness of Feedforward Neural Networks (FNNs), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks, and one-dimensional Convolutional Neural Networks (1D-CNNs) in forecasting loan defaults. Despite the growing body of research in this area, comparative studies focusing on the application of various neural network techniques to loan default prediction remain relatively scarce.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tran, D., & Tham, A. W. (2025). Accuracy Comparison Between Feedforward Neural Network, Support Vector Machine and Boosting Ensembles for Financial Risk Evaluation. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 18(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm18040215

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free