Academic Achievement and Peer Tutoring in Mathematics: A Comparison Between Primary and Secondary Education

29Citations
Citations of this article
205Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Peer tutoring in Mathematics has reported academic benefits across many educational levels, from Preschool to Higher Education. However, recent literature reviews and meta-analysis state that students experience higher gains in Primary or Elementary Education (ages 7–12 years) than in secondary education or middle school and high school (ages 13–18 years). This study examined the effects of peer tutoring on students’ mathematics achievement in primary and secondary education under similar settings. 89 students from first, fourth, seventh, and ninth grades participated in the study. The design of this research was quasi-experimental with pretest–posttest without control group. The statistical analysis reported significant improvements for both, Primary and Secondary Education. The comparison between these educational levels showed that there were no significant differences in the increments of the students’ marks. The global effect size reported for the experience was Cohen’s d = 0.78. The main conclusion is that Peer Tutoring in Mathematics reports similar academic benefits for both, Primary and Secondary Education. Future research must be conducted as the superiority of Peer Tutoring in Primary over Secondary Education has yet to be proved in the Mathematics subject.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Alegre, F., Moliner, L., Maroto, A., & Lorenzo-Valentin, G. (2020). Academic Achievement and Peer Tutoring in Mathematics: A Comparison Between Primary and Secondary Education. SAGE Open, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020929295

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free