The post-Human Genome Project mindset: Race, reliability, and health care

6Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The following essay reports on the first session of a 2-day workshop on genetic diversity and science communication, organized by the Institute of Genetics. I argue that the four talks in this session reflected two different facets of a 'post-Human Genome Project (HGP)' view of human genetics. The first is characterized by an increasing interest in genetic differences. Two speakers - Troy Duster and Jasber Singh - expressed skepticism about one aspect of this trend: an emphasis on race in medicine and genetics. The other two speakers - Kenneth Weiss and Gustavo Turecki - spoke to a second facet of the post-HGP view: a recognition of the difficulty in translating genetic discovery into medical or public health applications. Though both sets of talks were highly critical of current trends in genetic research, they pulled in opposite directions: one warned about the role of genetics in stabilizing racial categories, while the other lamented the failure of any genetic claims or categories to stabilize at all. I argue that the use of racial categories in medicine seems likely to encounter scientific, medical, and social challenges. © 2006 The Author Journal compilation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kimmelman, J. (2006). The post-Human Genome Project mindset: Race, reliability, and health care. Clinical Genetics, 70(5), 427–432. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-0004.2006.00706.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free