Abstract
This second progress report addresses the understanding of place in legal geography, and asks how it resonates with the wider philosophies and conceptualizations of place. By taking four viewpoints to place – territory and location, legal signification, law on the move, and place agency – the report argues that place thinking can offer intellectual tools for overcoming territorial legal thinking, and for acknowledging the legal relevance of situations and places that fall outside of a sovereign legal system. There is also potential for refreshing the rather stagnant human geographical discussions on the concept of place more widely.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Kymäläinen, P. (2025). Legal geography II: The possibilities and disruptions of place. Progress in Human Geography, 49(3), 323–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/03091325251320244
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.