Patients' experience of epilepsy and health care

36Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective. The aim of this study was to assess the severity of epilepsy and its effect on patients' lives, and to describe patients' use of and attitudes to health care. Method. A questionnaire was sent to 595 people with epilepsy identified from 14 general practices in north-west Bristol. All patients aged 16 years and over receiving anti-epileptic medication for their epilepsy were included in the study. Areas investigated included severity of epilepsy and its effect on quality of life, anti-epileptic medication and its perceived effect, health care utilization and preferences for health care. Results. Seizure frequency was strongly associated with adverse effects of epilepsy. Attacks of epilepsy were experienced at least monthly by 20.4% (95% confidence intervals (CI) 17.0-23.7%) of patients, 29.4% (25.4-33.4%) took more than one anti-epileptic drug, 56.1% (50.1-62.2%) reported drug side effects, 74.1% (70.3-77.8%) would prefer to receive all or most of their epilepsy care in a general practice setting, and 69.8% (63.5-76.2%) would like contact with a primary care-based epilepsy specialist nurse. During the previous year 42.4% (35.9-48.8%) of patients had not seen a doctor about their epilepsy. Of patients who had attended the general practice only 13.4% (9.6-17.2%) had regular arrangements to see their GP about epilepsy. Patients receiving both primary and secondary care had the greatest needs and wants for improved care. Conclusions. Structured care, including regular appointments, co-ordination of primary and secondary care, and increased monitoring and discussion, may improve the quality of life of people with epilepsy, but requires evaluation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mills, N., Bachmann, M., Harvey, I., McGowan, M., & Hine, I. (1997). Patients’ experience of epilepsy and health care. Family Practice, 14(2), 117–123. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/14.2.117

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free