Preventing venous thromboembolism in long-term care residents: Cautious advice based on limited data

12Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In hospitalized medical patients, randomized trials have established that anticoagulant prophylaxis has an acceptable benefit-to-risk ratio: ie, it lowers the incidence of clinically silent and symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE), including fatal pulmonary embolism, more than it raises the risks of bleeding and other complications. However, no similar trials have been done in longterm care residents. More research is needed to ascertain which long-term care residents would benefit most from VTE prophylaxis. In the absence of evidence-based guidelines, we advocate a selective approach.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pai, M., & Douketis, J. D. (2010). Preventing venous thromboembolism in long-term care residents: Cautious advice based on limited data. Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine, 77(2), 123–130. https://doi.org/10.3949/ccjm.77a.09096

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free