Interaction of protein synthesis initiation factor 2 from Xenopus laevis oocytes with GDP and GTP analogs

4Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The structural specificity of the purified protein synthesis initiation factor 2 (eIF-2) from X. laevis ovary towards analogs of GTP and GDP was studied. The relative affinity of the structural analogs was measured by their capacity to inhibit the formation of the [3H]GDP·eIF-2 binary complex. The results obtained demonstrate that modifications in the ribose moiety are well tolerated by eIF-2 which binds dGTP, 2′,3′-dialdehyde GTP (oGTP) and 2′,3′-dialdehyde GDP (oGDP) and even the dinucleotide cytidylyl(5′-3′)guanosine 5′-triphosphate (pppGpC). Substitution in the polyphosphate chain by phosphorothioate groups in the β and γ positions (GDPβS or GTPγS) does not abolish the affinity for the nucleotides and the presence of an imido group between the β and γ phosphates in guanyl-5′-yl imidodiphosphate (GppNHp) still permits a weaker but significant binding. Guanine 5′-O-(2-fluorodiphosphate) (GDPβF) has an affinity considerably lower than GDPβS. Methylation of position 7 of the guanine (7-m GDP), however, completely eliminates the interaction of GDP with eIF-2. The analogs tested can be listed in the following order of descending affinities: GDP > GDPβS > oGDP≥ GTPγS > GDPβF > pppGpC > GTP > GppNHp > oGTP ≫ 7-m GDP. Assays of the capacity of GTP analogs to form a ternary complex of the type met-tRNAi·GTP·eIF-2 or of GDP analogs to inhibit the formation of this complex reflect, in general, the same order of relative affinities except for pppGpC, which is weaker in its capacity to form a ternary complex than GppNHp or oGTP, although it has a higher affinity than these compounds in the formation of a binary complex. © 1987.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Carvallo, P., & Allende, J. E. (1987). Interaction of protein synthesis initiation factor 2 from Xenopus laevis oocytes with GDP and GTP analogs. FEBS Letters, 215(1), 109–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-5793(87)80123-0

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free