Vestibular Evoked Myographic Correlation

8Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This work started from the hypothesis that the physiological processes giving rise to the vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) can be induced not only by transient sounds but also by a continuous stimulation with a stochastic signal. The hypothesis is based on the idea that the number of motor unit action potentials (MUAPs) decreases after a momentary amplitude increase of the effective stimulus, whereas a momentary amplitude decrease has the opposite effect. This concept was theoretically analyzed by assuming that the effective stimulus is closely related to the envelope of the stimulus actually presented. The analysis led to the prediction that the cross-correlation function of the effective stimulus and the measured electromyogram (EMG) has VEMP-like properties. Experiments confirmed this prediction, thus providing evidence of a novel electrophysiological response: the vestibular evoked myographic correlation (VEMCorr). The methodological approach corresponded to a conventional VEMP study, except that the stimulus (delivered with a hand-held minishaker) comprised not only a series of 500-Hz tone pulses (classical VEMP measurement, for comparison) but also sequences of narrow-band noise with a center frequency of 500 Hz (VEMCorr measurement). Each of the 12 test persons showed a clear VEMCorr. Moreover, VEMP and VEMCorr largely resembled each other, as predicted. Apparently they are two different expressions of a more general mechanism that leads to a roughly linear relationship between stimulus envelope and expectation of the EMG. Future applications of the VEMCorr could exploit that a continuous-stimulation paradigm allows for varying the center frequency of the stimulus without changing the relative bandwidth.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lütkenhöner, B. (2019). Vestibular Evoked Myographic Correlation. JARO - Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 20(1), 99–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-018-00698-9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free