Abstract
This article looks at constructions involving optional movement of contrastive foci and argues that this type of reordering cannot be accounted for by assuming that it is driven by a syntactic feature. I maintain that an interface-based approach that rests on the principles of economy fares better at capturing the data, as it accounts not only for optionality of contrastive-focus movement, which is found in a wide variety of languages, but also for multiple landing sites for contrastive-focus movement, which are found in scrambling languages, such as Russian.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Titov, E. (2020). Optionality of Movement. Syntax, 23(4), 347–374. https://doi.org/10.1111/synt.12202
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.