Quantified control in healthcare work: Suggestions for future research

21Citations
Citations of this article
45Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This paper outlines promising avenues for empirical research on quantified control in healthcare work. A review of key insights from accounting, organization studies, and the emergent sociology of quantification indicates that numbers are productive as well as deceptive and seductive, that they enable control but can be evaded, and that they typically have unintended effects. It remains to be further explored how multiple forms of measurement and quantified control play out in everyday healthcare work. Other questions worth probing concern the limits and capabilities of numbers as a shared language, the differential and disciplinary effects of numbers on social groups, the use of numbers for impression management, and how people manage to resist or mobilize numbers for different purposes. Calling for additional qualitative, close-up studies, the paper proposes a research focus on everyday practices and the interactions of diverse control measures. It sets out several fruitful methodological pathways, both the well-established approaches of ethnography and Actor-Network Theory and the more novel approaches of investigating numbers as communicative acts or as dramaturgical performances.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Levay, C., Jönsson, J., & Huzzard, T. (2020, November 1). Quantified control in healthcare work: Suggestions for future research. Financial Accountability and Management. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12242

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free