On categorising online collaborative translation and the consequences for the field of research

2Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Translation Studies possesses a plethora of meta-concepts such as ‘online collaborative translation’, ‘community translation’, ‘volunteer translation’, etc. to refer to phenomena like translation crowdsourcing, fansubbing, fandubbing, etc. The existence of these various meta-concepts reflects an obvious need to categorise and subsume such phenomena under a meta-category. The paper will attempt to explain why this is the case, why categorising in and of itself is vital and how it relates to boundaries and undertaking boundary-work, both crucial processes in academia. The paper will advocate, based on boundary-work, for using ‘online collaborative translation’ as a meta-category and conclude by presenting a conceptual map of this meta-category and its various sub-categorisations.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zwischenberger, C. (2024). On categorising online collaborative translation and the consequences for the field of research. Translator, 30(1), 13–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2023.2275348

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free