Nitrous oxide production from an ultisol of the humid tropics treated with different nitrogen sources and moisture regimes

57Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

To investigate the impact of different N sources and moisture regimes on N2O production, laboratory incubations using a Bungor series soil (Typic Paleudults) were carried out for a period of 25 days, A maximum N2O flux was detected upon application of chicken manure (2,379±221 μg N2O-N kg-1 soil day-1) at 60% water-filled pore space (WFPS). Application of KNO3, groundnut residue and urea resulted in a smaller emission rate (615-699 μg N2O-N kg-1 soil day-1). Addition of (NH4)2SO4 and maize residue produced the lowest rate, 246±40 and 229±54 μg N2O-N kg-1 soil day-1, respectively. The increase in pH H2O to around 5.5, upon addition of urea and organic matter, increased the N2O production markedly after a lag period for nitrification. The N2O production was increased by decreasing the C/N ratio of the organic N sources. The N2O-N loss was higher from inorganic N (3.5-8.5%) than from the organic N sources (1.6-6.7%), probably because of nitrate reduction during the initial period of incubation. The N20 fluxes generally were small (26.6-38.7 μg N2O-N kg-1 soil day-1) and were increased by increasing the moisture content. The relatively dry soil (20% WFPS) acted as a sink. The increases in total N2O production at 40%, 60% and 80% WFPS were 0.46, 0.58 and 0.72 mg N2O-N kg-1 soil, respectively, over the value at 20% WFPS. Results indicate that the acid soil could be a potential source of N2O if treated with urea/KNO3 and easily decomposable organic matter under favorable moisture conditions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Khalil, M. I., Rosenani, A. B., Van Cleemput, O., Boeckx, P., Shamshuddin, J., & Fauziah, C. I. (2002). Nitrous oxide production from an ultisol of the humid tropics treated with different nitrogen sources and moisture regimes. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 36(1), 59–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-002-0505-1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free