Visual evoked potential importance in the complex mechanism of amblyopia

24Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

To compare the visual evoked potential (VEP) responses of amblyopic eyes with VEP responses of sound eyes in amblyopic children. A study of 65 amblyopic children with pattern-reversal VEPs elicited by checkerboard stimuli with large, medium and small checks. The children were classified into three groups: Group A, 22 children with anisometropic amblyopia; Group B, 16 children with exotropic strabismic amblyopia; and Group C, 27 children with esotropic strabismic amblyopia. Visual acuity (VA) was significantly worse in the amblyopic eye as compared to the sound eye. However, no statistically significant difference was found between the amblyopic and sound eye of amblyopic children in the three groups for VEP P1 amplitude and latencies for any check sizes. VEP is a very important tool in understanding the complex amblyopic mechanism. Although the sound eye has superior VA, the absence of differences in VEP P1 amplitudes and latencies demonstrate the functional abnormality of the eye considered 'good'. More studies are necessary to explain why the sound eye in amblyopic children cannot be considered completely normal. Special attention should therefore be paid to amblyopic treatment, as patching can have a negative effect on the sound eye. © 2013 The Author(s).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Halfeld Furtado De Mendonça, R., Abbruzzese, S., Bagolini, B., Nofroni, I., Ferreira, E. L., & Odom, J. V. (2013). Visual evoked potential importance in the complex mechanism of amblyopia. International Ophthalmology, 33(5), 515–519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-013-9734-6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free