Life after sepsis: An international survey of survivors to understand the post-sepsis syndrome

78Citations
Citations of this article
175Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: In this study, we aim to describe the post-sepsis syndrome from the perspective of the sepsis survivors. Design and Setting: The study is a prospective, observational online international survey. Participants: Sepsis survivors enrolled via social media from 13 September 2014 to 13 September 2016. Interventions: None. Main Outcome Measures: Physiologic, physical and psychological function post-sepsis; and patient satisfaction with sepsis-centered care. Results: 1731 completed surveys from 41 countries were analyzed, with 79.9% female respondents, age 47.6 ± 14.4 years. The majority of respondents (47.8%) had sepsis within the last year. Survivors reported an increase in sensory, integumentary, digestive, breathing, chest pain, kidney and musculoskeletal problems after sepsis (all P-value <0.0001). Physical functions such as daily chores, running errands, spelling, reading and reduced libido posed increased difficulty (all P-value <0.0001). Within 7 days prior to completing the survey, the survivors reported varying degrees of anxiety, depression, fatigue and sleep disturbance. Sepsis survivors reported dissatisfaction with a number of hospital support services, with up to 29.3% of respondents stating no social services support was provided for their condition. Conclusions: Sepsis survivors suffer from a myriad of physiologic, physical and psychological challenges. Survivors overall reveal dissatisfaction with sepsis-related care, suggesting areas for improvement both in-hospital and post-discharge.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Huang, C. Y., Daniels, R., Lembo, A., Hartog, C., O’Brien, J., Heymann, T., … Vroomen-Durning, M. (2019). Life after sepsis: An international survey of survivors to understand the post-sepsis syndrome. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 31(3), 191–198. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzy137

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free