Why dichotomies can be misleading while dualities fit the analysis of complex phenomena

4Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Humans' tendency to classify and categorize is definitely overspread, but it can be misleading at all fields, including epistemology, ontology, theory, and analysis of scientific knowledge construction itself. Sanchez and Loredo (IPBS: Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science 43:4, in their article on classification of contemporary constructivists fall exactly into such pitfall- even as their effort to make sense of many outstanding theorists is impressive and intriguing. A further analysis, however, points at the theoretical trap posed by such endeavor, for models arisen from different epistemological standpoints cannot be compared along the lines of a simplistic polarity between "objectivism" and subjectivism". There is much more to be taken into account when a intrinsically complex subject like constructivism and constructionism epistemological approach and their welcome different versions-perspectives-are submitted to analysis and critical evaluation. © 2009 Springer Science + Business Media, LLC. © Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2009.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Branco, A. U. (2009). Why dichotomies can be misleading while dualities fit the analysis of complex phenomena. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 43(4), 350–355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-009-9105-z

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free