Primary prevention of diabetic retinopathy with fibrates: A retrospective, matched cohort study

24Citations
Citations of this article
56Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the progression of diabetic retinopathy (DR) in people with type 2 diabetes treated with fibrates with that of non-exposed controls. Design: Retrospective, matched cohort study. Setting: UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD). Participants: 5038 people with type 2 diabetes with a history of fibrate exposure but without evidence of DR were identified. Three thousand one hundred and seventy-six (63%) people could be randomly matched to one non-exposed control; of these, 2599 (81.8%) were matched without any missing blood pressure or glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) values. Main outcome measures: The primary endpoint was first recorded DR with a secondary endpoint of allcause mortality or first DR. Time to clinical endpoints was compared using Cox proportional hazards models. Results: Mean follow-up was 5.1 and 5.0 years for fibrate-exposed and non-exposed patients, respectively. For fibrate-exposed participants, there was a reduction in DR: 33.4 events/1000 person-years vs 40.4 (p=0.002), and in death or DR: 50.6 vs 60.2 (p<0.001). For those matched with full systolic blood pressure and HbA1c data, crude event rates were 34.3 versus 43.9 for DR (p<0.001) and 51.2 vs 63.4 (p<0.001) for death or DR. Following adjustment, DR was significantly delayed for those treated with fibrates, with an adjusted HR (aHR) of 0.785 (p<0.001) for participants with complete data and an aHR of 0.802 (p<0.001) for all participants. Conclusions: The treatment with fibrates in people with type 2 diabetes was independently associated with reduced progression to a first diagnosis of DR.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Morgan, C. L., Owens, D. R., Aubonnet, P., Carr, E. S. M., Jenkins-Jones, S., Poole, C. D., & Currie, C. J. (2013). Primary prevention of diabetic retinopathy with fibrates: A retrospective, matched cohort study. BMJ Open, 3(12). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004025

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free