Explicit processing demands reveal language modality-specific organization of working memory

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
57Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The working memory model for Ease of Language Understanding (ELU) predicts that processing differences between language modalities emerge when cognitive demands are explicit. This prediction was tested in three working memory experiments with participants who were Deaf Signers (DS), Hearing Signers (HS), or Hearing Nonsigners (HN). Easily nameable pictures were used as stimuli to avoid confounds relating to sensory modality. Performance was largely similar for DS, HS, and HN, suggesting that previously identified intermodal differences may be due to differences in retention of sensory information. When explicit processing demands were high, differences emerged between DS and HN, suggesting that although working memory storage in both groups is sensitive to temporal organization, retrieval is not sensitive to temporal organization in DS. A general effect of semantic similarity was also found. These findings are discussed in relation to the ELU model. © 2008 The Author(s).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rudner, M., & Rönnberg, J. (2008). Explicit processing demands reveal language modality-specific organization of working memory. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 13(4), 466–484. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enn005

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free