Retracted articles - the scientific version of fake news

6Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Retracted articles, especially those retracted due to misconduct, data fabrication, or manipulation and other ethical issues should be considered as the scientific version of fake news. Such articles, especially those published in the medical and biomedical sciences, put not only the scientific integrity in danger but also have the potential to harm public health. In today’s reality, where many people receive most of their science and medical information from social media, fabricated results of medical research could potentially have devastating outcomes to human health. One of the problems with retracted articles is that it sometimes takes several years for them to be identified. In the meantime, they might continue to be read, shared, reported on, and cited in the scientific and lay persons’ literature and media outlets. This chapter describes some of the characteristics of problematic medical articles that were retracted from the literature due to a variety of reasons ranging from ethical misconduct, data fabrication, and manipulation to plagiarism and showcases their characteristics and impact in the scientific and social outlets.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bar-Ilan, J., & Halevi, G. (2020). Retracted articles - the scientific version of fake news. In The Psychology of Fake News: Accepting, Sharing, and Correcting Misinformation (pp. 47–70). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429295379-5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free