Sedation during spinal anaesthesia: Comparison of propofol and midazolam

144Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Propofol and midazolam were compared in 40 patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery under spinal anaesthesia. An infusion of either 1% propofol or 0.1% midazolam was given at a rate adjusted to maintain a similar level of sedation. The mean time to reach this required level was similar in both groups. Quality and ease of control of sedation were good in all patients. A mean infusion rate of 3.63 mg kg-1 h-1 was required for propofol and 0.26 mg kg-1 h-1 for midazolam. Immediate recovery, as judged by ability to open eyes and recall date of birth, was significantly more rapid following propofol (P < 0.0001). Similarly, restoration of higher mental function was significantly faster following propofol, measured by choice reaction time and critical flicker fusion threshold. Amnesia for the immediate postoperative period was significantly greater after midazolam (P = 0.0001). © 1990 Copyright: 1990 British Journal of Anaesthesia.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wilson, E., David, A., Mackenzie, N., & Grant, I. S. (1990). Sedation during spinal anaesthesia: Comparison of propofol and midazolam. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 64(1), 48–52. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/64.1.48

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free