Treatment of locoregional disease: Adjuvant versus neoadjuvant

1Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The efficacy of adjuvant therapy after the resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma has been demonstrated by several randomized studies. Postoperative treatment applied either as chemotherapy alone or in combination with chemoradiotherapy is therefore considered a recommended standard in resectable pancreatic cancer (PC). Multiple arguments speak in favor of preoperative systemic therapy. Specifically, the conception of PC as a metastatic disease even at the early stage of apparent resectability supports the strategy of upfront systemic therapy. Unfortunately, randomized studies comparing neoadjuvant with adjuvant regimens have not been performed, and the superiority of one strategy over the other still has to be confirmed. Future clinical research may even combine neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment. New avenues of individualized treatment may also be reached by the inclusion of molecular parameters of the tumor and pharmacogenomic profiles of the patient into decision making. © The author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Heinemann, V. (2012). Treatment of locoregional disease: Adjuvant versus neoadjuvant. Annals of Oncology, 23(SUPPL. 10). https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mds312

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free