Reducing prescribing errors: Can a well-designed electronic system help?

13Citations
Citations of this article
51Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Rationale, aims and objectives In this study, the aim was to investigate if an electronic prescribing system designed specifically to reduce errors would lead to fewer errors in prescribing medicines in a secondary care setting. Method The electronic system was compared with paper prescription charts on 16 intensive care patients to assess any change in the number of prescribing errors. Results The overall level of compliance with nationally accepted standards was significantly higher with the electronic system (91.67%) compared with the paper system (46.73%). Electronically generated prescriptions were found to contain significantly fewer deviations (28 in 329 prescriptions, 8.5%) than the written prescriptions (208 in 408 prescriptions, 51%). Conclusion Taking an interdisciplinary approach to work on the creation of a system designed to minimize the risk of error has resulted in a favoured system that significantly reduces the number of errors made. © 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Went, K., Antoniewicz, P., Corner, D. A., Dailly, S., Gregor, P., Joss, J., … Shearer, A. J. (2010). Reducing prescribing errors: Can a well-designed electronic system help? Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 16(3), 556–559. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01159.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free