Infinite and finite Gleason's theorems and the logic of indeterminacy

47Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In the first half of the paper I prove Gleason's lemma: Every non-negative frame function on the set of rays in ℛ3 is continuous. This is the central and most difficult part of Gleason's theorem. The proof is a reconstruction of Gleason's idea in terms of orthogonality graphs. The result is a demonstration that this theorem is actually combinatorial in nature. It depends only on a finite graph structure. In the second half of the paper I use the graph construction to obtain results about probability distributions (non-negative frame functions with weight one) on finite sets of rays. For example, given any two distinct nonorthogonal rays a and b, I construct a finite set of rays Γ that contains them, and has the following property: No probability distribution on Γ assigns both a and b a truth value (probability zero or one) unless they are both false. Thus the principle of indeterminacy turns into a theorem of propositional quantum logic (or partial Boolean algebras). © 1998 American Institute of Physics.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pitowsky, I. (1998). Infinite and finite Gleason’s theorems and the logic of indeterminacy. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 39(1), 218–228. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.532334

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free