Comment On The Proposals Regarding The Generic Name Pectinaria Lamarck, 1818. Z.n.(S.) 2202

  • Banse K
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this comment on the proposals regarding the generic name Pectinaria (Bull. Zool. Nomencl., vol. 34: 112; vol 35: 18, 25) the author asks that the Law of Priority be applied as long as it is practical but not if stability of names or usage is threatened. It is considered that at the Family level no serious difficulties will arise if the Law of Priority is applied and Amphectenidae is used. At the genus level the author urges that the generic name Pectinaria be preserved and Cistena suppressed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Banse, K. (1979). Comment On The Proposals Regarding The Generic Name Pectinaria Lamarck, 1818. Z.n.(S.) 2202. The Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature., 36, 146–147. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.part.28813

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free