Comparative analysis of oxygenator dysfunction in polymethylpentene oxygenators: A pilot study

4Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Introduction: Polymethylpentene (PMP) oxygenators serve as the primary oxygenator type utilized for ECMO. With the number of PMP oxygenators available, it has become increasingly important to determine differences among each oxygenator type that can lead to varying metrics of oxygenator dysfunction. Methods: This study was a retrospective, single-center analysis of adult patients supported on ECMO between December 2020 to December 2021 with varying PMP oxygenators including the Medtronic Nautilus Smart (Minneapolis, MA), the Eurosets AMG PMP (Medolla, Italy) and Getinge Quadrox-iD and the Getinge Cardiohelp HLS Module Advanced System (Gothenberg, Sweden). Results: A total of 19 patients were included in our study. 10 patients (52.6%) were supported with a Medtronic Nautilus Smart oxygenator, 5 patients (26.3%) were supported with an Eurosets AMG PMP Oxygenator, and 4 patients (21.1%) were supported with either a Getinge Quadrox-iD oxygenator or Getinge Cardiohelp HLS system. Patients supported with Eurosets AMG PMP oxygenators experienced higher resistance and lower post-oxygenator PaO2 in comparison to other cohorts (p

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Modi, S. P., D’Aloiso, B., Palmer, A., Smith, S., Arlia, P., Anselmi, M., … Ramanan, R. (2025). Comparative analysis of oxygenator dysfunction in polymethylpentene oxygenators: A pilot study. Perfusion (United Kingdom), 40(4), 933–940. https://doi.org/10.1177/02676591241268402

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free