Determination of volume of distribution for ethanol in male and female subjects

34Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Ten nonalcoholic subjects gave written informed consent. Six men (aged 25-43) and four women (aged 25-35) were hydrostatically weighed to determine their percentage of body fat and lean weight. Each subject fasted for at least 10 h and then received an oral dose of alcohol (0.9 g per kilogram of lean body weight) calculated to yield a peak alcohol concentration of 0.100 g/210-L breath. Breath alcohol measurements were conducted at 20-min intervals until each subject's alcohol concentration returned to 0.000 g/210-L breath. All alcohol analyses were conducted on the Intoxilyzer 5000® and reported as g/210-L breath. Female subjects on average reached a lower peak alcohol concentration (mean, 0.086; range, 0.074-0.091 g/210 L) than male subjects (mean, 0.096; range, 0.093-0.101 g/210 L). Females demonstrated a higher average rate of elimination (mean, 0.017; range, 0.014-0.021 g/210 L) than males (mean, 0.015; range, 0.013-0.017 g/210 L). Female subjects on average had a higher percentage of body fat (mean, 26.0; range, 16.7-36.8%) than males (mean, 18.0; range, 10.2-25.3%). The average volume of distribution (V(d)), as calculated from percentage of body fat, for the women (mean, 0.63; range, 0.54-0.71) was less than for the men (mean, 0.69; range, 0.63-0.76). The average V(d) as calculated from linear regression of the alcohol concentration curve, for the women (mean 0.64, range, 0.56-0.71) was also less than for the men (mean, 0.72; range, 0.67- 0.77). The data from this limited study indicate that hydrostatic weighing is an acceptable way of determining V(d) for both men and women.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cowan, J. M., Weathermon, A., McCutcheon, J. R., & Oliver, R. D. (1996). Determination of volume of distribution for ethanol in male and female subjects. Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 20(5), 287–290. https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/20.5.287

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free